The Ghost of Christmas Future

by Scott Jangro on December 5, 2009

If you haven’t been paying attention, Google’s been busy experimenting with showing product images and shopping results more prominently in search results.

Yesterday Adam Viener posted an eye-opening screenshot of Google Search results. A search for USB extension cable showed search results containing a very skewed list of search results.

search-results.jpg 906×636 pixels.png

In Adam’s example, PC Connection’s products garnered three top spots in the sponsored listings. From Adam’s perspective as a search affiliate, this raises some questions about the availability of ad space to businesses like his.

Here’s another example where Zappos pwns the search results page.

google and zappos

Angel Djambazov asked Google Affiliate Network team about the recent changes to the search results page and got the following response:

We can confirm that the product listing ads beta discussed in Adam’s piece is being facilitated by the Google Affiliate Network platform. At Google, we’re constantly experimenting with new features, tools and visual representations to improve the user experience and usefulness of our ads. In accordance with that philosophy, we’re beta testing a new format to show richer product information, including images, prices and product titles in the ads for shopping-related queries. This test is part of a limited beta and not available to all advertisers at this time.

What do you think of these trends?

  • zorzllc
    I'm inclined to think that they are trying to use a new algorithm to basically test a product across keywords, optimize its ad placement for best EPC and then stick it there...we'll still compete with them, so the only way to beat them is to have a better conversion rate.
  • I have seen these ads in quite a few other SERPS. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=... is one.

    If I were an advertister I would think this would be great for some specific, product related long tail searches. You could show the exact product and I would guess the CTR would be very high.

    But I think it will hurt the traffic on the natural SERPS. People are gonna go click on the pictures as opposed to the relevant sites listed in hte natural results.

    So for advertisers: great. For natural SERPS: not so great
  • Nice rank there Joe. :)

    It would be really interesting if you could compare traffic with and without those images showing in the SERPS for that term.

    Previously, the #1 spot essentially guaranteed a certain percentage of the clicks (what is it, 80% or something?). The images bring you right down to the middle of the page.

    I wonder what the images does for redefining the "top of the page". Surely the images are getting a big part of that. But what about the rank right below them? Does that get more eyeballs now?
blog comments powered by Disqus

Previous post: Don’t Mislead Consumers, Not in Texas Anyway

Next post: Links for December 5th